(no subject)
Sep. 11th, 2005 06:12 pmApparently I've been bashing Ed/Winry over on
fm_alchemist and I didn't even know it. Has my computer been wanking without me? How unfair! Dammit, I want to at least be present for my own wanks!
[edit] With the helpful advice of
kaltia, I've managed to place the girl in question and the event in question. Which answers the question of "...when did I...?" and replaces it with several more levels of WTF.
1) I was referring not to Ed/Winry as a whole, but rather to doujinshi. One specific doujinshi, in fact. Are you really so invested in your fandom that a comment on one single work of it is an attack on the entire fandom? ...Don't answer that. And you got on my case about generalization.
2) Much less being related to a moderator decision, that wasn't even on the comm! That was on this comm, over here. fm_a is this other comm, over here. See? Different names, different URLs. Oh, I give up.
3) How she expanded from a single comment on a Winry/Ed doujinshi to "She abuses her mod powers to ban Ed/Win shippers for shipping Ed/Win and completely ignores offenses by Roy/Ed shippers!" is one of those magical logic skills I have not yet mastered.
And finally,
4) You know, if you're trying to raise my opinion of Ed/Win, it really doesn't help your case to tell me that 99% of the time it's Ed raping Winry rather than the other way around. You know? It just... doesn't.
[edit] With the helpful advice of
1) I was referring not to Ed/Winry as a whole, but rather to doujinshi. One specific doujinshi, in fact. Are you really so invested in your fandom that a comment on one single work of it is an attack on the entire fandom? ...Don't answer that. And you got on my case about generalization.
2) Much less being related to a moderator decision, that wasn't even on the comm! That was on this comm, over here. fm_a is this other comm, over here. See? Different names, different URLs. Oh, I give up.
3) How she expanded from a single comment on a Winry/Ed doujinshi to "She abuses her mod powers to ban Ed/Win shippers for shipping Ed/Win and completely ignores offenses by Roy/Ed shippers!" is one of those magical logic skills I have not yet mastered.
And finally,
4) You know, if you're trying to raise my opinion of Ed/Win, it really doesn't help your case to tell me that 99% of the time it's Ed raping Winry rather than the other way around. You know? It just... doesn't.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 06:15 pm (UTC)I'm ever so slighty irritated myself. If there is anything worse then generalizations it's ones that are... well... really wrong.
*eye-roll*
no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 06:21 pm (UTC)Unless there's something that happened that I forgot about. Which is entirely possible. I have the memory of a sieve.
I predict one of two things: one, that I made some offhand comment which I myself didn't see as bashing, and thus forgot about, that was misread and resented, or two, it has nothing to do with me at all, and I'm simply being lumped into a group with people they don't like.
What is a cockspanker, anyway? It sounds perverted. Inquiring minds want to know.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 09:12 pm (UTC)Also, HAPPY BIRTHDAY! Armstrong wishes you happy birthday and offers birthday spanks. :D
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 06:22 pm (UTC)Man. People really DON'T have their priorities straight.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 06:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 06:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:Re: ...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 07:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 07:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 07:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 09:51 pm (UTC)Hohenheim has copied you into a humunculus and now there is a Mikkeneko!Greed out there putting down EdWin on
Dang girl, you better be careful, I hear those sin's are mean!
no subject
Date: 2005-09-11 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-12 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-12 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-12 02:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-12 03:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-12 03:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-13 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-12 05:31 am (UTC)So by that token, she could take me saying I don't like one specific Roy/Ed doujinshi as me hating the entire pairing.
She's wacked.
Where's her evidence for these bannings?
4) O_o Yeah, not the best way to give someone a good opinion of the pairing. Because Ed raping Winry is just so much better than the alternative!
Geesh, I'm with Sharon, this makes yaoi fans look rather tame!